Supreme Court Has Made a Controversial Decision about Judges and Hacking

The Supreme Court has made quite a controversial decision, when it comes to allowing judges to issue warrants about computers everywhere. In this way, a judge may order the issuance of a warrant beyond his jurisdiction and this might lead to a more penetrative hacking activity on behalf of the FBI.

The amendments that are proposed are included here and Congress has the power either to agree or disagree with the decision till December. After that, the decision will be put into effect and the hacking activity will become visible in the near future.

In the defense of the Supreme Court, a lot of criminals have got sophisticated means of technology to help them out. So, this decision will offer a way to overcome the barriers applied by technology. Engaging in crime on the web is an act that has spread over the past few years and nobody can argue with that.

As a result, getting the chance to reach computers all over the US may be the key to prevent such crimes from rising even further. Only with state-of-the-art technology and deep knowledge on the subject can someone deal with online threats.

The FBI has been making significant efforts to strengthen their hacking abilities and their power on the Internet. Issuing warrants everywhere will certainly enhance their options, too. Still, is this the best way to deal with such a phenomenon of crime? Justin Harvey, who is the chief security officer at Fidelis Cybersecurity, has commented on this subject: “In my opinion, we aren’t becoming safer by giving the government a legal ability to hack any computer anywhere,” and added: “We know that the FBI has purchased malware toolkits from companies like Hacking Team, and these types of actions could lead us down a very dark path.”

One Reply to “Supreme Court Has Made a Controversial Decision about Judges and Hacking”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *